ChatGPT in education

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Output from ChatGPT generating an essay draft

The usage of ChatGPT in education has sparked considerable debate and exploration. ChatGPT is a chatbot based on large language models (LLMs) that was released by OpenAI in November 2022.

ChatGPT's adoption in education was rapid, but it was initially banned by several institutions. The potential benefits include enhancing personalized learning, improving student productivity, assisting with brainstorming, summarization, and supporting language literacy skills. Students have generally reported positive perceptions, but specific views from educators and students vary widely. Opinions are especially varied on what constitutes appropriate use of ChatGPT in education. Efforts to ban chatbots like ChatGPT in schools focus on preventing cheating, but enforcement faces challenges due to AI detection inaccuracies and widespread accessibility of chatbot technology. In response, many educators are now exploring ways to thoughtfully integrate generative AI into assessments.

Background

[edit]
Part of a series on
OpenAI
Models
People
Concepts

Generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models are large language models trained to generate text. ChatGPT is a virtual assistant developed by OpenAI and based on GPT models. It launched in November 2022 and has had significant improvements as new GPT models were released. After pre-training, these GPT models were fine-tuned to adopt an assistant role, improve response accuracy and reduce harmful content; using supervised learning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF).[1] Due to the training methods, ChatGPT can produce many plausible sounding falsehoods a concept sometimes referred to as hallucination.[2][3]

ChatGPT gained over 100 million users in only two months following its release, becoming the fastest-growing consumer software application in history.[4] Similar chatbots include Gemini and Claude.

Applications

[edit]

Proponents argue for integrating ChatGPT into educational frameworks responsibly, leveraging its potential to enhance learning outcomes through personalized approaches.[5][6] Student perceptions of ChatGPT are generally positive, with many finding it to be an effective tool for learning, productivity, and problem-solving.[7] A global study found that approximately 58% of students reported finding the AI tool useful in their daily lives. When asked to describe their views on ChatGPT in writing, the most common terms used were "good", "helpful", and "tool", reflecting an overall favorable perception of the platform. The study also highlighted that ChatGPT was particularly beneficial in blended learning environments, where a significant portion of learning is conducted online. Though the majority of students still expressed a preference for in-person assistance over AI, they acknowledged the value of ChatGPT as a helpful resource, especially when in-person support was unavailable.[8]

A global survey from 2024 found that students primarily use ChatGPT for brainstorming, summarization, and research assistance, finding it effective for simplifying complex information but less reliable for factual accuracy and classroom learning. While students recognized its potential to enhance AI literacy and digital communication professors highlighted significant limitations in critical thinking, interpersonal communication, and decision-making skills.[8]

AI tools like ChatGPT have shown promise in enhancing literacy skills among adolescents and adults learning English as a second language. They provide instant feedback on writing, aid in idea generation, and help improve grammar and vocabulary.[9] These tools can also support students with disabilities, such as dyslexia, by assisting with spelling and grammar.[10][11] Additionally, AI can facilitate higher-order thinking by automating lower-order tasks, allowing students to focus on complex conceptual work. On the other hand, LLMs may perpetuated biases in the training data and it is unclear how to treat student's data privacy.[11]

In a 2023 study ChatGPT generated a SWOT analysis of itself in an educational setting, identifying several key issues and potential uses. The study authors then highlighted that while ChatGPT can generate human-like responses and assist with personalized learning, it also has limited factual accuracy. The study noted that ChatGPT's responses often lacked depth in understanding broader educational goals and processes, and focused primarily on providing immediate answers to queries. The potential biases in ChatGPT's training data and the ethical implications of its use were also discussed, particularly concerning the control exerted by its developers over the content it generates.[12]

Technology writer Dan Gillmor used ChatGPT in 2022 on a student assignment, and found its generated text was on par with what a good student would deliver and opined that "academia has some very serious issues to confront".[13]

Geography professor Terence Day assessed in 2023 citations generated by ChatGPT and found them to be fake. Despite this, he writes that "the titles of the fake articles are all directly relevant to the questions and could potentially make excellent papers. The lack of a genuine citation could signal an opportunity for an enterprising author to fill a void." According to Day, it is possible to generate high-quality introductory college courses using ChatGPT; he used it to write materials for "introductory physical geography courses, my second-year course in geographical hydrology, and second-year cartography, geographic information systems, and remote sensing." He concludes that "this approach could have significant relevance for open learning and could potentially affect current textbook publishing models."[14] ChatGPT was also seen as an opportunity for cheap and individualized tutoring, leading to the creation of specialized chatbots like Khanmigo.[15]

Adoption into assignments

[edit]

The use of AI in education has vast potential, as it can provide personalized learning experiences and adaptive teaching methods.[16] Andrew Maynard and Jules White both developed university courses specifically for prompt engineering generative AI chatbots.[17] Several professors have incorporated ChatGPT into assignments.[18][19] One stated that the usage of ChatGPT generally improved his students' work by using AI to further assist in the generation of ideas.[18] These professors acknowledged it is not feasible or practical to ban students from using it, and stressed on the importance of being responsible users of AI.[18][19]

Impact

[edit]

Daniel Herman's perspective reflects concerns about the potential devaluation of writing skills if AI can generate text as easily as humans.[20] Similarly, Naomi S. Baron wrote "If AI text generation does our writing for us, we diminish opportunities to think out problems for ourselves".[21] She also mentioned the risk of a slippery slope, where students start letting generative AI control the content and style of their writing, leading to a diminished sense of ownership.[21] Others highlight the need for educators to adapt their methods to focus more on critical thinking and reasoning,[22] as AI tools like ChatGPT could potentially be used for plagiarism or produce biased content.

Writing centers may be particularly impacted by the growing use of ChatGPT in education. Although there are local policies on AI usage, university-wide policies are currently not well established, and with this comes a burden that is placed on writing center tutors, who may have to act as "police clients for unethical AI-generated writing". According to a 2024 survey done on writing centers, participants stated that they believed they would need to be able to advise clients on the "ethical issues of using AI tools" and "recognize AI-generated text and discuss academic integrity".[23]

Jordan MacDonald noted that students who use ChatGPT to retrieve information on a topic may lack the knowledge required to identify false or misleading information.[24] Students' over-reliance on ChatGPT may impact their cognitive offloading and memory retention.[25]

Academic integrity

[edit]

ChatGPT's capability to generate assignments has prompted concerns about academic integrity, particularly in essay writing, with critics foreseeing potential misuse and devaluation of traditional writing skills.[26][27][28] A survey conducted between March and April 2023 revealed 58% of American students acknowledged using ChatGPT, with 38% admitting use without teacher consent, highlighting challenges in enforcing bans.[29][30] Students have shown strongly differing opinions on the extent to which the use of ChatGPT should be viewed as misconduct.[31][32] Kevin Roose stated that ChatGPT's prohibition was impractical to enforce. Students can access the internet outside of schools, effectively rendering a ban obsolete; he further suggested that teachers allow it openly for some assignments similar to calculators, and that teaching with the AI is the best approach.[5]

A professor at Texas A&M University misused ChatGPT to check student assignments for verifying whether an assignment utilized the large language model. ChatGPT claimed all the students used it, and so the professor gave a failing grade to all of his students. In fact, ChatGPT is unable to reliably verify whether it was used to write a piece of text. A post to a Reddit community dedicated to ChatGPT received widespread attention with many attacking the professor for a lack of familiarity towards the chatbot.[33][34]

Universities have stated serious concerns with the integrity of their curriculum due to students using ChatGPT and other AI tools. Baylor University asked students to submit handwritten essays in order to uphold academic integrity. The oral exam has also been used as an example of an instruction method which could circumvent the assignment and test students' knowledge more effectively on a 1:1 basis.[6]

Placing digital watermarks on AI-generated content to distinguish it from original student work may ameliorate this problem in the future.[35][36]

Business

[edit]

In response to educational demand, OpenAI launched "ChatGPT Edu" in May 2024, aiming to offer universities affordable access to this technology.[37]

The education technology company Chegg, which was a website dedicated to helping students with assignments using a database of collected worksheets and assignments, became one of the most prominent business victims to ChatGPT, with its stock price nearly being cut in half after a quarterly earnings call in May 2023.[38][39]

Bans

[edit]

Some educational institutions have chosen to ban access to ChatGPT. The reasons behind these decisions likely vary, but concerns about potential misuse, such as plagiarism or reliance on AI for writing tasks, could be driving factors. ChatGPT has been met with various bans from certain educational institutions. One of the earliest districts to ban the tool was the Los Angeles Unified School District, which blocked access to the tool less than a month after its official release.[40] The New York City Department of Education blocked access to ChatGPT announced a ban around January 4, 2023.[41][42][43]

In February 2023, the University of Hong Kong sent a campus-wide email to instructors and students stating that the use of ChatGPT or other AI tools is prohibited in all classes, assignments and assessments at the university. Any violations would be treated as plagiarism by the university unless the student obtains the prior written consent from the course instructor.[44][45]

Repeals

[edit]

Some schools in the United States for the 2023–24 school year announced a repeal of their bans for ChatGPT. In May 2023, New York City repealed its ban on ChatGPT.[46] Davis Banks, the head of New York City’s public schools at the time, explained that the initial decision to ban the tool was driven by a "knee-jerk fear [that] overlooked the potential of generative AI to support students and teachers". He also recognized that AI would inevitably be a part of students' future workplaces and argued that teaching them to use it ethically would be more beneficial than imposing a blanket ban. With the ban lifted, educators in New York City now have the opportunity to use ChatGPT for various educational purposes, including teaching about AI prejudice and creating lessons. To assist in this transition, the city's Department of Education committed to providing educators with “resources, real-life examples of successful AI implementation in schools, and an AI toolkit”.[47]

Another district, Walla Walla Public Schools, located in rural Washington, also lifted its ban on ChatGPT starting in the 2023–24 school year. To support this transition, the district hosted a daylong workshop that focused on the positive learning benefits of AI in the classroom. The event was attended by around 100 local educators. Following the workshop, many of these participants expressed a newfound confidence in integrating ChatGPT into their educational plans.[40]

Detection software

[edit]
Main article: Artificial intelligence content detection

Some companies have responded to the influx of ChatGPT and generative AI usage among students by developing detection software which flags down essays likely written by AI.[48][49] Among the first companies to develop solutions like this was Turnitin. A corporate blog post from the company stated that the company's database of numerous student essays was used to train its own detection system. When tested by The Washington Post, it was noted that Turnitin's detector flagged an innocent student for using ChatGPT to generate the conclusion of her essay.[50] The company reported that its detector was 98% accurate.[51][52] There have been numerous other cases similar to this in which a student is falsely accused of using AI and report not knowing how to prove their innocence.[53] This is especially prevalent among already marginalized groups such as non-native English speakers, black students, and neurodiverse students due to AI detection tools being more likely to flag writing by these groups as a result of linguistic differences.[54]

Other similar detection tools include GPTZero and ones by numerous other startups, including OpenAI itself. However, research reports have stated that detection software often fails to detect content generated by AI, and that these tools are easy to fool.[55][56][49] Tools such as AI humanizers, which aim to make AI-generated text appear more human-like, help to trick AI detectors.[57] OpenAI's official AI detection tool, Classifier, launched in January 2023, and was later taken down in August 2023 due to low usage and accuracy issues.[58][59][60]

To combat false accusations of academic dishonesty, AI detection creators and educators recommend not relying solely on these tools.[61] Educators should clearly state their policies on what qualifies as AI-usage and learn more about AI tools themselves.[62] In 2023, some scholars predicted that truly reliable AI text detection may never be possible. As generative AI models continue to closely replicate human language, distinguishing between human- and AI-generated text is expected to become increasingly challenging.[49]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Gerjets, Peter; Warschauer, Mark; Tate, Tamara; Chen, Xiaobin; Alekseeva, Anastasiia; Fischer, Christian; Fütterer, Tim (2023). "ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations". Scientific Reports. 13 (1): 15310. Bibcode:2023NatSR..1315310F. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42227-6. PMC 10504368. PMID 37714915.
  2. ^ Metz, Cade (November 6, 2023). "Chatbots May 'Hallucinate' More Often Than Many Realize". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. Retrieved November 6, 2023.
  3. ^ de Wynter, Adrian; Wang, Xun; Sokolov, Alex; Gu, Qilong; Chen, Si-Qing (September 2023). "An evaluation on large language model outputs: Discourse and memorization". Natural Language Processing Journal. 4: 100024. arXiv:2304.08637. doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100024.
  4. ^ "ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base – analyst note". Reuters. Archived from the original on January 6, 2025. Retrieved January 19, 2025.
  5. ^ a b Roose, Kevin (January 12, 2023). "Don't Ban ChatGPT in Schools. Teach With It". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  6. ^ a b Belkin, Douglas (June 1, 2023). "As AI-Enabled Cheating Roils Colleges, Professors Turn to an Ancient Testing Method". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  7. ^ "What Students Are Saying About ChatGPT". The New York Times. February 2, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2025.
  8. ^ a b Ravšelj, Dejan; Keržič, Damijana; Tomaževič, Nina; Umek, Lan; Brezovar, Nejc; Aristovnik, Aleksander. (2025). "Higher education students' perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions". PLOS ONE. 20 (2): e0315011. Bibcode:2025PLoSO..2015011R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315011. PMC 11798494. PMID 39908277.
  9. ^ Mahapatra, Santosh (February 13, 2024). "Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students' academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study". Smart Learning Environments. 11 (1): 9. doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9. ISSN 2196-7091.
  10. ^ Svensson, Idor; Nordström, Thomas; Lindeblad, Emma; Gustafson, Stefan; Björn, Marianne; Sand, Christina; Almgren/Bäck, Gunilla; Nilsson, Staffan (February 17, 2021). "Effects of assistive technology for students with reading and writing disabilities". Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 16 (2): 196–208. doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1646821. PMID 31418305.
  11. ^ a b Bronstein, Briana; Wolfe, Zora M.; Ciampa, Katia (September 26, 2023). "Transforming digital literacy practices". ChatGPT in Education. 67 (3): 186–195. doi:10.1002/jaal.1310.
  12. ^ Loos, Eugène; Gröpler, Johanna; Goudeau, Marie-Louise Sophie (August 21, 2023). "Using ChatGPT in Education: Human Reflection on ChatGPT's Self-Reflection". Societies. 13 (8): 196. doi:10.3390/soc13080196.
  13. ^ Hern, Alex (December 4, 2022). "AI bot ChatGPT stuns academics with essay-writing skills and usability". The Guardian. Archived from the original on January 17, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  14. ^ Day, Terence (April 12, 2023). "A Preliminary Investigation of Fake Peer-Reviewed Citations and References Generated by ChatGPT". The Professional Geographer. 75 (6): 1024–1027. Bibcode:2023ProfG..75.1024D. doi:10.1080/00330124.2023.2190373. ISSN 0033-0124. S2CID 258115209.
  15. ^ Schwartz, Sarah (May 30, 2023). "What ChatGPT Could Mean for Tutoring". Education Week. ISSN 0277-4232. Retrieved March 9, 2025.
  16. ^ Popescu, Anca (January 9, 2024). "AI's Secret Weapon in Education. ChatGPT – The Future of Personalized Learning". Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series V: Economic Sciences: 45–52. doi:10.31926/but.es.2023.16.65.2.5. ISSN 2065-2208.
  17. ^ Coffey, Lauren. "Professors Craft Courses on ChatGPT With ChatGPT". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  18. ^ a b c Kelly, Mary Louise (January 26, 2023). "'Everybody is cheating': Why this teacher has adopted an open ChatGPT policy". NPR. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  19. ^ a b Villasenor, John (February 10, 2023). "How ChatGPT Can Improve Education, Not Threaten It". Scientific American. Retrieved December 7, 2023.
  20. ^ Herman, Daniel (December 9, 2022). "The End of High-School English". The Atlantic. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
  21. ^ a b Baron, Naomi S. (January 19, 2023). "How ChatGPT robs students of motivation to write and think for themselves". The Conversation. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
  22. ^ Girdharry, Kristi; Khachatryan, Davit (2023). "Meaningful Writing in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence". Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing. 11 (1): 1–10. doi:10.37514/dbh-j.2023.11.1.04. ISSN 2372-7497.
  23. ^ Lindberg, Nathan; Domingues, Amanda (August 2024). "2024 Report on AI Writing Tools' Impacts on Writing Centers".
  24. ^ Dolan, Eric W. (April 14, 2024). "ChatGPT hallucinates fake but plausible scientific citations at a staggering rate, study finds". PsyPost – Psychology News. Retrieved April 6, 2025.
  25. ^ "ChatGPT May Lead To The Downfall Of Education And Critical Thinking". Tech Business News. April 2, 2023. Retrieved April 6, 2025.
  26. ^ Marche, Stephen (December 6, 2022). "The College Essay Is Dead". The Atlantic. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  27. ^ Brown, Kevin (December 23, 2022). "Why Educators Shouldn't Be Worried About AI". ChristianityToday.com. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  28. ^ Bowman, Emma (December 19, 2022). "A new AI chatbot might do your homework for you. But it's still not an A+ student". NPR. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  29. ^ Klar, Rebecca (May 10, 2023). "Teens use, hear of ChatGPT more than parents: poll". The Hill. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  30. ^ Impact Research. "Parents and students are optimistic about AI, but parents have a lot to learn to catch up to their kids – and want rules and ratings to help them" (PDF). Common Sense Media. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  31. ^ Lund, Brady D.; Lee, Tae Hee; Mannuru, Nishith Reddy; Arutla, Nikhila (March 20, 2025). "AI and Academic Integrity: Exploring Student Perceptions and Implications for Higher Education". Journal of Academic Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10805-025-09613-3. ISSN 1572-8544.
  32. ^ Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk (April 1, 2025). "Students' perceptions of 'AI-giarism': investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct". Education and Information Technologies. 30 (6): 8087–8108. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7. ISSN 1573-7608.
  33. ^ Klee, Miles (May 17, 2023). "Professor Flunks All His Students After ChatGPT Falsely Claims It Wrote Their Papers". Rolling Stone. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  34. ^ "College instructor put on blast for accusing students of using ChatGPT". NBC News. May 18, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  35. ^ Werse, Nicholas R. (2023). "What Will Be Lost? Critical Reflections on ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, and the Value of Writing Instruction". Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing. 11 (1): 1–4. doi:10.37514/DBH-J.2023.11.1.07.
  36. ^ "Understanding the source of what we see and hear online". OpenAI. May 7, 2024. Archived from the original on September 27, 2024.
  37. ^ "OpenAI unveils ChatGPT Edu to bring AI responsibly to university campuses". The Indian Express. May 31, 2024. Retrieved June 16, 2024.
  38. ^ Dave, Paresh (June 5, 2023). "Chegg Embraced AI. ChatGPT Ate Its Lunch Anyway". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved October 18, 2023.
  39. ^ Shin, Rachel (July 12, 2023). "A.I. can kill your business in an instant. Just ask the CEO of Chegg". Fortune. Retrieved October 18, 2023.
  40. ^ a b Singer, Natasha (August 24, 2023). "Despite Cheating Fears, Schools Repeal ChatGPT Bans". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  41. ^ "New York City Department of Education Bans ChatGPT". GovTech. January 10, 2023. Archived from the original on February 16, 2023. Retrieved February 16, 2023.
  42. ^ Cole, Samantha (January 4, 2023). "NYC Bans Students and Teachers from Using ChatGPT". Vice.com. Archived from the original on January 5, 2023. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
  43. ^ Ropek, Lucas (January 4, 2023). "New York City Schools Ban ChatGPT to Head Off a Cheating Epidemic". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on January 6, 2023. Retrieved January 6, 2023.
  44. ^ "港大禁用ChatGPT等AI工具，为全港大学首例". The Paper. China News Service. February 18, 2023. Archived from the original on March 6, 2023. Retrieved February 19, 2023.
  45. ^ Yau, Cannix; Chan, Kahon (February 17, 2023). "University of Hong Kong temporarily bans students from using ChatGPT". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on February 19, 2023. Retrieved February 19, 2023.
  46. ^ Faguy, Ana. "New York City Public Schools Reverses ChatGPT Ban". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved May 21, 2023.
  47. ^ Serrano, Jody (May 19, 2023). "New York City Schools Lift Ban on ChatGPT, Say Initial Fear 'Overlooked the Potential' of AI". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023. Retrieved May 21, 2023.
  48. ^ "How Do AI Detectors Work? | GPTZero". AI Detection Resources | GPTZero. October 14, 2024. Retrieved April 1, 2025.
  49. ^ a b c Alimardani, Armin; Jane, Emma A. (February 19, 2023). "We pitted ChatGPT against tools for detecting AI-written text, and the results are troubling". The Conversation. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
  50. ^ Fowler, Geoffrey A. (April 14, 2023). "Analysis | We tested a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  51. ^ Delouya, Samantha. "Turnitin is the go-to software to catch students cheating. Now it's focused on a potential cat-and-mouse game with OpenAI's new ChatGPT chatbot". Business Insider. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  52. ^ "Sneak preview of Turnitin's AI writing and ChatGPT detection capability". www.turnitin.com. January 13, 2023. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  53. ^ Hale, Rachel. "She lost her scholarship over an AI allegation — and it impacted her mental health". USA TODAY. Retrieved April 1, 2025.
  54. ^ Hirsch, Amanda (December 12, 2024). "AI detectors: An ethical minefield – Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning". Retrieved April 1, 2025.
  55. ^ "ChatGPT Detectors Are Biased and Easy to Fool, Research Shows". CNET. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  56. ^ Barshay, Jill (September 4, 2023). "PROOF POINTS: It's easy to fool ChatGPT detectors". The Hechinger Report. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  57. ^ Street, Emma (January 19, 2025). "Do AI Humanizers Actually Work? We Tested Them And This Is What We Found". SlashGear. Retrieved April 1, 2025.
  58. ^ Goodwin, Danny (July 26, 2023). "OpenAI's AI Text Classifier no longer available due to 'low rate of accuracy'". Search Engine Land. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  59. ^ David, Emilia (July 25, 2023). "OpenAI can't tell if something was written by AI after all". The Verge. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
  60. ^ Elkhatat, Ahmed M. (January 1, 2023). "Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text". EBSCO.
  61. ^ Coffey, Lauren. "Professors Cautious of Tools to Detect AI-Generated Writing". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved April 1, 2025.
  62. ^ Gillham, Jonathan. "Why AI Detection Alone Shouldn't Be Used To Establish Academic Standing". Forbes. Retrieved April 1, 2025.
[edit]